The testimony of 18 school colleagues and 2 teachers of Nam Joohyuk
Seo Seokhoon (Classmate in 10th grade), Lee XX (Classmate in 10th grade), Shin XX (Classmate in 10th grade), Park XX (Classmate in 11th grade), H (Classmate in 11th and 12th grade), Shin XX (Classmate in 12th grade), S1 (Classmate in 12th grade), S2 (Classmate in 12th grade), Kim XX (Classmate in 12th grade), Cho Boo-hyung (School colleague), Lee XX (School colleague), Park XX (School colleague), Son XX (School colleague), Y1 (School colleague), Y2 (School colleague), J (School colleague), Park Taegyu (Homeroom teacher in 10th grade), Hong Sungman (Homeroom teacher in 12th grade)
--
If you were a reporter and there's information from an informant. Will you be covering the news?
First of all, we have to check the credibility of the informant. You have to know the harm that had been caused and then you have to find the evidence. But in this case, I ran into a wall. School violence cases that, mostly, happened years ago. There's only statements, but there's (almost) no evidence.
If the School Violence Committee is held, it gives the informant's statement some power. The student records could also be a good reference. Especially if there's a medical record, it could increase the credibility of the source's statement even more.
On the other side, what if the only evidence the informant has is their school yearbook? But still, school violence shouldn't be ignored just like that. Remembering the wound that the informant received because of it. At this moment, it's very important to examine the statement.








.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
















