is just bothering me. I think there's more to it. It just doesn't make sense that a private picture of her was spread online and she didn't do anything about it. On top of that, Kim Garam, who stepped up on her behalf, got the level 5 punishment instead?ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
[+658][-18]
1. [+303][-1] I think she has her own reason for that. The school and office of education are not stupid. I'm just very sick of Hybe. It's a fact that Kim Garam got the level 5 punishment, but they keep twisting the fact so that the victim seems like the perpetrator. Are they really human?
2. [+272][-2] I think you should keep this in mind. For the accurate information, I think you can hear it from the legal side, right?
.jpeg)
'The picture was not taken in a hidden-cam manner. She was taking a selfie and accidentally captured Kim Garam and her friend in the back. Her friend was not even just wearing her underwear, she was wearing something that exposed a little bit of skin. The picture was posted on Instagram and she told it to Kim Garam. Kim Garam asked her why she posted that picture and that girl told her own mother about it. Everything about school-transferring will be revealed through her legal reps tonight. The original text is way longer, but it's from an online community so the accuracy is still being questioned, that's why I didn't attach a screen capture of it'
3. [+190][-4] Logically, if I got the level 5 punishment for defending my friend, whose private picture was taken without permission, I would do something about it. If there was really a girl whose private picture was taken without permission, she should've said something when the rumors about Kim Garam's school violence surfaced online.
4. [+89][-0] It just doesn't make senseㅋㅋㅋ When a case is being opened, each party, teachers, office of education, and their parents were gathered and they all would be questioned and investigated. But it resulted in the person who took the hidden-cam manner being protected and Kim Garam got the level 5 punishment? We were all aware of hidden-cam even 4 years ago. In fact, we were even more aware of it than we are right now.
5. [+65][-0] The committee doesn't just give out level 5 punishment easily, especially to a middle school student. Level 6 punishment is usually given to sexual assault cases and level 4 for sexual harassment cases. Why would they give out the level 5 punishment to a case that didn't even involve physical violence? She got in a fight for defending her friend, whose private pictures were taken withoutt permission? What kind of nonsense is that? If she really did take pictures without permission, she would've gotten the same level 5 punishment. I'm sure Hybe is going to change their statements later.
